ecancermedicalscience

Research

Anal cancer impact among people with HIV infection – a matched cohort study

3 Jun 2025
Amanda Acioli de Almeida Robatto, Erika Andrade Rocha, Renata Colombo Bonadio, Denis Artico Galhera, Carolina Teixeira Muratori, Admir Andre Belo Bueno, Abraão Ferreira Lopes Dornellas, Luciana Bastos Valente Alban, Carolina Ribeiro Victor, Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli, Marília Polo Mingueti e Silva, Camila Soares Araujo, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Marques, Caio Sergio Rizkallah Nahas, Karim Yaqub Ibrahim, André Tsin Chih Chen, Paulo Marcelo Gehm Hoff, Camila Motta Venchiarutti Moniz

Background: Pivotal studies with curative chemoradiation (CRT) in anal cancer did not include HIV-positive (HIV+) patients. HIV status impact remains unknown in this scenario.

Methods: In this retrospective matched cohort study, electronic medical records were reviewed at Sao Paulo State Cancer Institute between 2010 and 2021 patients with anal cancer T1-4 N0-1 M0 by AJCCVIII were selected. For each HIV+ patient, one or two HIV-negative (HIV-) cases were matched by age, stage (T, N) and ECOG. The primary endpoint was OS, estimated using Kaplan-Meir and compared with the log-rank test.

Results: 122 patients were selected, 45 being HIV+. The median follow-up was 37 months. Most patients, n = 119 (98%), received concomitant CRT and had ECOG 0/1 (n = 116, 95%). Stage III corresponded to 69% of the patients (n = 85). Positive nodes were detected in 76 patients (62%). No difference was observed in complete clinical response (cCR) post-CRT (68% in HIV+ versus 63% in HIV-; p = 0.6). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was not reached; 3-year RFS rates were 60.7% in HIV+ versus 63.1% in HIV- [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% CI 0.66–2.17, p = 0.538]. Median OS was not reached; 3-year OS was 66.4% HIV+ versus 72.2% in HIV- (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.61–2.47, p = 0.546). HIV+ pts presented significantly more hospital admissions due to toxicity, 30% (n = 12/40) versus 13% (n = 10/74) (p = 0.049). No difference between groups was found for colostomy (p = 0.69) and salvage surgery (p = 1).

Conclusion: Anal carcinoma HIV+ patients treated with CRT presented similar cCR, RFS and OS compared with HIV- patients. Optimal therapy should be attempted in the HIV+ population; however, close clinical monitoring due to higher hospital admission is required.

Artículos relacionados

G Luis Pendola, Roberto Elizalde, Pablo Sitic Vargas, José Caicedo Mallarino, Eduardo Gonzalez, José Parada, Mauricio Camus, Ricardo Schwartz, Enrique Bargalló, Ruffo Freitas, Mauricio Magalhaes Costa, Vilmar Marques de Oliveira, Paula Escobar, Miguel Oller, Luis Fernando Viaña, Antonio Jurado Bambino, Gustavo Sarria, Francisco Terrier, Roger Corrales, Valeria Sanabria, Juan Carlos Rodríguez Agostini, Gonzalo Vargas Chacón, Víctor Manuel Pérez, Verónica Avilés, José Galarreta, Guillermo Laviña, Jorge Pérez Fuentes, Lía Bueso de Castellanos, Bolívar Arboleda Osorio, Herbert Castillo, Claudia Figueroa
Nieves Martínez Lago, María Vieito Villar, Rafael Varela Ponte, Ihab Abdulkader Nallib, Juan José Carrera Alvarez, José Ramón Antúnez López, Rafael López López, María Elena Padin Iruegas
José Fernando Robles Díaz, Adela Heredia Zelaya, Alicia Milagros Avalos Rosas
María Eugenia Giavedoni, Lucas Staringer, Rosa Garrido, Cintia Bertoncini, Mabel Sardi, Myriam Perrotta