ecancermedicalscience

Review

Mapping the cancer research landscape across Zambia: evidence to support national cancer control planning

2 Jul 2025
Susan Msadabwe, Peng Yun Ng, Richard Sullivan, Kennedy Lishimpi, John Kachimba, Justor Banda, Jane Mumba, Abidan Chansa, Mutuna Chiwele, Kasonde Bowa, Kaseya Chiyenu, Linda Malulu-Chiwele, Julie Torode, Grant Lewison, Andrew Leather, Ajay Aggarwal, Kathleen Schmeler, Groesbeck Parham, Kabisa Mwala, Paul Kamfwa

Background: Zambia faces the double burden of rising cancer incidence and a disproportionate volume of mortality from delayed presentations. The Ministry of Health Zambia acknowledged cancer research as a key pillar of cancer control in the National Cancer Control Strategic Plan 2022–2026, but there remains a paucity of country-specific evidence to inform strategies, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of research activities. Our study aimed to map and critically analyse the existing cancer research landscape to inform national planning.

Methods: We adopted a two-stage mixed-method research. First, we conducted a systematic review, including 76 Zambian cancer studies published between 2012 and 2022, adhering to PRISMA guidance. Second, we conducted an in-person modified consensus meeting in Ndola, Zambia attended by 31 domestic and international stakeholders, to co-develop priorities and strategies based on gaps and facilitators identified through the systematic review.

Results: The year-on-year cancer research output in Zambia had risen and diversified beyond cervical cancer but prevention, palliative care and health economic studies were lacking. Delay in deciding to seek care was most studied (n = 17, 63.0%), especially in cervical cancer. Research activities were mostly retrospective (n = 47/76, 61.8%) with only one randomised controlled trial identified. Greater than 90% (n = 10/11, 90.9%) of the most prolific research funders were international, predominantly from the United States and the United Kingdom, and Zambian researchers were under-represented as first and last authors at 43% (n = 33/76) and 45% (n = 34/76), respectively. The existing national cervical cancer registry, active global collaboration and adoption of technology were facilitators to be leveraged to build research capacity through multi-level, stakeholder-specific strategies.

Conclusion: To strengthen research capacity, sustained commitment to priorities through the implementation of co-developed strategies is required at individual, organisational and institutional levels. This paradigm shift is necessary to deliver evidence-based cancer care tailored to the needs of Zambians with emphasis on value and quality.

Related Articles

Annesha Chakraborti, Badira Cheriyalinkal Parambil, Venkata Rama Mohan Gollamudi, Maya Prasad, Siddhartha Laskar, Nehal Khanna, Jifmi Jose Manjali, Sajid Qureshi, Mukta Ramadwar, Poonam Panjwani, Akshay Baheti, Vasundhara Patil, Sneha Shah, Girish Chinnaswamy
Md Foorquan Hashmi, Fiza Khan, Elen Baloyan, Liana Safaryan, Davit Zohrabyan, Gevorg Tamamyan, Samvel Bardakhchyan
Marco Aurélio Bertúlio das Neves, Noemi Dreyer Galvão, Fernanda Cristina da Silva de Lima, Júlio Fernando Pinto Oliveria, Sancho Pedro Xavier, Ageo Mário Cândido da Silva
Parth Sharma Harsh Thakkar, Aryan Patil, Preeti Chauhan, Priya Chembon, Shalini Arora Joseph, Smriti Rana, Raj Kalady, Vidhi Wadhwani, Gaurav Urs, Padmavathy Krishna, Rontu Sangma, Rajendra Dutt Bijalwan, Sunanda Samal, Lalit Selvaraju, Syed Mohammad Askari Naqvi, Jatin Bhukal, Johnsurya John, Muttacaud Ramakrishnan Rajagopal, Siddhesh Zadey