A study co-led by investigators at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre found that most of the benefits of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer occur within the first 9 to 12 months.
The study was published in the journal JAMA Oncology.
Extending therapy beyond that provides only small additional protection and increases the risk of other health problems, such as heart or metabolic issues.
Results show that the ideal length of ADT depends on cancer risk:
ADT is a type of hormone therapy that is commonly given alongside radiation to slow the growth of prostate cancer by lowering testosterone.
While effective at controlling the disease, long-term ADT can cause side effects, including bone loss, muscle loss and cardiovascular problems.
Current treatment guidelines generally recommend 4 to 6 months of ADT for intermediate-risk patients and 18 to 36 months for high-risk patients, but the optimal duration has been unclear.
Researchers conducted a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium using data from 10,266 men across 13 international clinical trials.
They assessed outcomes including overall survival, cancer-specific survival and deaths from other causes, comparing different ADT durations.
The findings highlight the importance of personalised treatment plans for men with prostate cancer.
Shorter courses of hormone therapy may be sufficient for many patients, reducing side effects while maintaining effectiveness.
Physicians can now use patient-specific factors, including cancer risk, overall health, age and preferences, to make more informed decisions about ADT duration, improving both safety and quality of life.
“Prostate cancer treatment should not be one-size-fits-all,” said Dr. Amar Kishan, professor and executive vice chair of radiation oncology, co-director of the cancer molecular imaging, nanotechnology and theranostics programme at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre and co-senior author of the study.
“These findings help doctors personalise therapy, balancing cancer control with potential side effects and other health risks.”
Other UCLA authors are Luca Valle, Matthew Rettig, Tahmineh Romero and Michael Steinberg.
Source: University of California - Los Angeles Health Sciences
We are an independent charity and are not backed by a large company or society. We raise every penny ourselves to improve the standards of cancer care through education. You can help us continue our work to address inequalities in cancer care by making a donation.
Any donation, however small, contributes directly towards the costs of creating and sharing free oncology education.
Together we can get better outcomes for patients by tackling global inequalities in access to the results of cancer research.
Thank you for your support.